Han. they/she. queer. 25.
I am sick of paying to live.
header by @courtdraws
https://linktr.ee/blacklivesmatter
Han. they/she. queer. 25.
I am sick of paying to live.
header by @courtdraws
https://linktr.ee/blacklivesmatter
What’s something that most people love, but you don’t?
Pizza
Dogs
Summer
Bread
Going to the movies
Video games
(via alsophila-grahami)
Something REALLY interesting about this scene
At the beginning of the scene Miles confronts Gwen about the ‘small elite strike-team’ comment.
Gwen lies and plays it off, saying that most of them are part-time anyway.
IMMEDIATELY after that in the next line dialogue, Hobie confronts Gwen and asks her ’Gwendy, how much have you told him about his place in all this? - Maybe not enough.’
Hobie is expressioning disappointment towards Gwen. He doesn’t approve of her lying to Miles, knowing what’s gonna happen to him. He doesn’t agree with them keeping him in the dark - which is why later in the scene he says
'I haven’t gotten a Scooby Doo, mate. But that’s what they want.’
He’s warning Miles that they’re keeping in him the dark, on purpose.
ONCE AGAIN Hobie showing foward thinking and outwardly disapproving of the obviously unfair treatment that Miles is given. He’s not angry at Gwen, but he’s willing to tell her straight up that she’s not doing or telling Miles enough to protect him.
Miles deserved to know Miguel’s motives BEFORE meeting him. That’s why he pointed it out then.
He’s ALWAYS looking out for Miles
The rich are villains!
🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯 parasites, sociopaths.
who else did this
the way these strikes get framed is always so funny to me
“the strike could stretch on until the end of summer” or the execs could pay their workers
“there won’t be ANY new shows because of this strike” or the execs could pay their workers
“no more content for us because the mean old writers and actors are-” OR THE EXECS COULD PAY THEIR WORKERS
(via corvigae)
In a statement to The Post, a spokesperson for NBCUniversal claimed the tree work is simply an annual ritual at this time of year. “We understand that the safety tree trimming of the Ficus trees we did on Barham Blvd. has created unintended challenges for demonstrators, that was not our intention. In partnership with licensed arborists, we have pruned these trees annually at this time of year to ensure that the canopies are light ahead of the high wind season,” they wrote. “We support the WGA and SAG’s right to demonstrate and are working to provide some shade coverage. We continue to openly communicate with the labor leaders on-site to work together during this time.”
If those trees were pollarded annually, the cut areas would NOT look like that. There would be big knobs of old growth at the trimming sites. Not seeing any of that here. The way those trees were topped (not pollarded, which is a very careful process that has to begin when the tree is immature) is excellent way to kill them due to loss of hydration, open sites to infection and parasitism during the best time of year for both, lack of nutrition due to so little greenery and new budding growth being left, sunburn and other exposure damage, and a myriad of other possibilities. Plus, if they were topped annually, they would not have the lovely drooping branches seen in the other picture but would have tons of vertical suckers instead.
This is what an annually pollarded mature tree should look like:
If this was done by the city, the public works arborists should be protesting in front of city hall and screaming their heads off right now. I’m not hearing about that, so… Tree law!
(via forlovefromfear)
CGI animators should unionize next. normally, their jobs would be too precarious to strike, since studios would replace them without a second thought, but if it’s part of this larger general film strike, they might finally have meaningful power to better their working conditions
if CGI animators unionized, it would kill the MCU. straight up. the the entire business model is built on exploiting CGI animators
THEY ARE TRYING!!!!! SIGN THE PETITION TO GET THE DISNEY ANIMATORS’ UNION RECOGNIZED
this petition is from IATSE (union), btw! it actually has credibility, unlike most change.org/etc petitions! please sign it!!
(via forlovefromfear)
So how do you tell which parts of your routine are load-bearing? I wish I knew, but some heuristics:
Things that are part of your access to food which you’ll reliably eat are often load-bearing. If you get a lot of your calories from the free food at work, you should expect changing jobs to one without free food will throw you off your game. If you rely on the corner store then you should expect that moving to a new place where you have to get in the car to get groceries will be a problem. Going vegetarian can screw up something load-bearing for a lot of people (and I say that as someone who believes that factory farming is morally horrible). Going on a diet is reasonably likely to fuck up something load bearing, and I suspect this is part of why statistically dieting doesn’t work at improving peoples’ lives or health.
Things that are part of the environments you spend the most time in are reasonably likely to be load-bearing.The length of your commute, the environment you work in, whether your bedroom is clean, well-ventilated, high-ceilinged, has natural light, whether you have any space that you don’t share with another person…. for some people ‘having a car’ is loadbearing because it’s a space that is theirs and will reliably have their stuff and get them places. For other people, living somewhere where they can get places without a car is load bearing.
Cleanliness needs are often load-bearing. This one especially sucks because you can get into a trap where your space gets chaotic/cluttered/awful and this breaks your brain and makes it harder to keep your space clean.
Pets are often load-bearing.
This might be influenced by who I hang out with, but I think personal time when you’re alone and no one has any claims on you is load bearing for a lot of people. Some people have their own room and know they need their own room, but lots of other people make do with a long commute where they can quietly listen to the radio, and don’t even realize that this is filling their need for introvert time until it changes.
I think people often have a particularly bad time if they have something load-bearing that’s considered ‘indulgent’ or a ‘luxury’, like ‘living in an apartment building with a pool’ or ‘having a big yard I can garden in’ or ‘having an ensuite bathroom with a tub’ or ‘having a soundproofed practice room’ or ‘having a grand piano’. But, like, having expensive load-bearing bits of your life does not say anything about you morally; it may mean that it’s harder for you to get your needs met, and it may not be a preferable situation, but it doesn’t make you selfish or greedy or bad. And, you know, trying to just not have things you need because you believe you’re bad for wanting them doesn’t often work out great.
(via juliuscaesarofficial)
girl i know i love old boats and they got into accidents all the time and i wouldnt exactly regard an ocean liner as a not horrifying mode of transport but i just remembered we used to have those fucking balloon airships. i dont like planes myself but thank god we started making air transport out of shit that wasnt 100% flammable
domt like that
girl they used to catch fire for no reason and kill everyone
THAT WAS ONE TIME
it happened a few times
(via snowstormborn)
Like to charge, reblog to cast
(via snowstormborn)
my favorite tag ever is “screaming crying etc” like i’m screaming and crying and. yknow what you can figure it out. i’m doing other things as well.
it’s taken at least 2 months but people are finally being funny in the notes of this
(via renchanters)
(via lordgroose)
is this even funny i dont think its funny im not putting it in the tags
How has this comic made such a groundbreaking cultural impact without getting over 40k notes
(via renchanters)